Journal of Turkish Clinical Biochemistry

The official publication of Turkish Society of Clinical Biochemistry

Diamond OA
No APCs
First Decision
30 Days
Indexed In
TR Dizin
Original Research
April 01, 2017
JTCB. 2017 Apr 1; 15 (1) : 016-023
76 98
PDF

Comparison of the CEDIA and KIMS Methods in Urine Drug Screen

1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Health Science Universty Elazığ Training and Research Hospital, Elazığ, Turkey
2 Kovancılar Public Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Elazig, Türkiye
3 Department of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry (Firat Hormones Research Group) School of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig,Turkey

Abstract

Objective: The accurate and reliable measurement of addictive substances is a very serious problem all over the world because it involves some legal liabilities. This study aims to measure the popular addictive substances using two common techniques and to reveal against each other their superior aspects using the gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry technique.

Methods: In accordance with the procedure, 83 urine samples were taken from the substance users. All samples were worked simultaneously by both techniques. The discordant results obtained were verified by the gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry technique.

Results: The amphetamine test was evaluated as false negative in 1 and 3 samples respectively by the techniques Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay (CEDIA) and Kinetic Interaction of Microparticles in Solution (KIMS). Both techniques were overall compatible for benzodiazepine results but one sample was dedected as false positive by KIMS. No discordance was detected for cocaine in two techniques. When cannabinoid test results examined, one sample was evaluated as false positive by CEDIA, one sample was evaluated as false negative by KIMS. All of the results for opiate test, obtained by both techniques, were compatible with each other but there was only one sample that was evaluated as false negative by KIMS method.

Conclusions: According to above results the KIMS technique was overall compatible with CEDIA technique. However, it was not valid that particularly for the amphetamine/ecstasy test (3,4 MDMA metabolite) in terms of the chromatography results. We believe that it will be beneficial for future studiesto take the results into consideration.

Citation

Çatak, Zekiye, Esra Kocdemir, and Suleyman Aydin. 2017. “Comparison of the CEDIA and KIMS Methods in Urine Drug Screen”. Journal of Turkish Clinical Biochemistry 15 (1):016-023. https://turkclinbiochem.org/index.php/pub/article/view/273.

Publish with JTCB

Diamond Open Access

Fully Diamond OA with no APCs and no submission fees. Your research is freely available to readers worldwide from the day it publishes.

30-Day First Decision

Double-blind peer review from an active editorial team returns a first decision in about 30 days, keeping your manuscript moving.

Global Platform

Backed by the Turkish Society of Clinical Biochemistry, JTCB welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide and reaches an international laboratory audience.

Focused Laboratory Scope

Method validation, analyzer comparisons, reference intervals, quality indicators, preanalytical studies, and instructive clinical case reports.

Credible and Discoverable

All manuscripts publish in English and follow ICMJE and COPE guidelines, with Crossref DOIs and TR Dizin indexing ensuring global discoverability.