Journal of Turkish Clinical Biochemistry

The official publication of Turkish Society of Clinical Biochemistry

Diamond OA
No APCs
First Decision
30 Days
Indexed In
TR Dizin
Original Research
August 01, 2018
JTCB. 2018 Aug 1; 16 (2) : 117-126

Allowable Total Error Criteria (TEa) Comparison Between Turkey and CLIA

1 Ağrı Patnos Devlet Hastanesi, Klinik Biyokimya, Ağrı, Türkiye
2 Ankara Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Klinik Biyokimya, Ankara, Türkiye
3 İstanbul Gaziosmanpaşa Taksim Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Klinik Biyokimya, İstanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

Purpose: Allowable total error (TEa) is an analytical quality specification setting acceptable limits for a single test result. It is used for sigmametric evaluation of test performance and description of control rules and measurement numbers. Total error of a test (TE) should not exceed the TEa as well. In Turkey, TEa criteria for some of laboratory tests have been defined as well as in many countries and their routine application has been started in October 2016. In this study, we aimed to evaluate our laboratory analytical performance with CLIA criteria which are frequently used and with Turkey criteria and in that way to improve our current control procedures.

Materials and methods: We realized the study in Beckman Coulter AU5800 biochemistry analyzer which is in routine use in our laboratory, utilizing third party controls and Unity Real Time software, using control procedures created according to CLIA criteria for six months from February to August 2016.

Results: We found that the number of parameters with sigma values below 3 went from 7 to 3; above 6 from 9 to 14 and between 3 and 6 remainded the same when we applied Turkey criteria instead of CLIAs. None of the TE values exceeded Turkey criteria including the two parameters whose sigmas were below 3, while 2 values were exceeding CLIA criteria.

Conclusion: The use of CLIA criteria with narrow acceptance intervals and the control procedures accordingly created to them provided us early detection of some errors. However, we think that Turkey criteria are more convenient for our laboratory conditions.

Citation

Altun, Zeynep, Ayşegül Keleş, and Nilhan Nurlu Ayan. 2018. “Allowable Total Error Criteria (TEa) Comparison Between Turkey and CLIA”. Journal of Turkish Clinical Biochemistry 16 (2):117-26. https://turkclinbiochem.org/index.php/pub/article/view/319.

Publish with JTCB

Diamond Open Access

Fully Diamond OA with no APCs and no submission fees. Your research is freely available to readers worldwide from the day it publishes.

30-Day First Decision

Double-blind peer review from an active editorial team returns a first decision in about 30 days, keeping your manuscript moving.

Global Platform

Backed by the Turkish Society of Clinical Biochemistry, JTCB welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide and reaches an international laboratory audience.

Focused Laboratory Scope

Method validation, analyzer comparisons, reference intervals, quality indicators, preanalytical studies, and instructive clinical case reports.

Credible and Discoverable

All manuscripts publish in English and follow ICMJE and COPE guidelines, with Crossref DOIs and TR Dizin indexing ensuring global discoverability.