Journal of Turkish Clinical Biochemistry

The official publication of Turkish Society of Clinical Biochemistry

Diamond OA
No APCs
First Decision
30 Days
Indexed In
TR Dizin
Original Research
April 01, 2007
JTCB. 2007 Apr 1; 5 (1) : 027-032

Are We Using High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein Rationally ?

1 Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Biyokimya Anabilim Dalı, İzmir
2 Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Klinik Biyokimya Bilim Dalı, İzmir

Abstract

Objective: After proving that chronic low grade inflammation is an important component of atherosclerotic process, C-reactive protein (CRP) has been started to be used for atherosclerotic vascular disease risk determination together with the other risk factors. In practice, to determine the prognosis of atherosclerotic vascular disease, CRP also is aplicable. For vascular purposes, determination limit less than 0.3 mg/L high sensitivity CRP assays are developed. These methods are much more expensive than conventioanal non-high sensitivity methods and should not be preferred for levels detectable with conventional CRP. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the application of hs-CRP at an effective measuring range and to investigate economic side of hs-CRP usage.

Material and Methods: Between 2003 and 2006 hs-CRP results were investigated. At this time period, according to detection limits of CRP, hs-CRP results distribution was designated.

Results: In four years, 5927 / 8673 (68.34%) patients had hs-CRP less than 5 mg/L and 2746 / 5927 (31.66%) had hs-CRP greater than 5 mg /L. There were no significant difference of these percentages between four years (p>0.050). In the second half of 2006, for patients CRP detection limit greater than 1 mg/L, hs-CRP measuring was 75.53 %. Number of test requests throughout four years gradually increased (1024, 1246, 2796,3607 tests, respectively).

Conclusion: According to the recent budget implementing directives, the price of a single test of hs-CRP is ten times greater than CRP (budget implementing directives; turbidimetric CRP versus micro CRP), and this study conveys a big economical lost due to the physician's request of high sensitive CRP although the sample concentration could be measured with methods that are not high sensitive. Measuring the concentration with a non-sensitive method first, and then if needed switching to a high sensitive method would be more rational and economical. Increasing most of the non high sensitivity methods' sensitivity by enabling them to be capable of detecting 1 mg/L as a concentration strengths our two step approach.

Citation

Işıklar, Özben Özden, Güneş Başol, Burcu Barutçuoğlu, Erkin Bozdemir, Ceyda Kabaroğlu, Zuhal Parıldar, Işıl Mutaf, and Dilek Özmen. 2007. “Are We Using High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Rationally ?”. Journal of Turkish Clinical Biochemistry 5 (1):027-032. https://turkclinbiochem.org/index.php/pub/article/view/82.

Publish with JTCB

Diamond Open Access

Fully Diamond OA with no APCs and no submission fees. Your research is freely available to readers worldwide from the day it publishes.

30-Day First Decision

Double-blind peer review from an active editorial team returns a first decision in about 30 days, keeping your manuscript moving.

Global Platform

Backed by the Turkish Society of Clinical Biochemistry, JTCB welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide and reaches an international laboratory audience.

Focused Laboratory Scope

Method validation, analyzer comparisons, reference intervals, quality indicators, preanalytical studies, and instructive clinical case reports.

Credible and Discoverable

All manuscripts publish in English and follow ICMJE and COPE guidelines, with Crossref DOIs and TR Dizin indexing ensuring global discoverability.